On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 07:32:46 GMT, David Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Daniel D. Daugherty has updated the pull request with a new target base due 
>> to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated 
>> changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains three 
>> additional commits since the last revision:
>> 
>>  - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8241403
>>  - Address coleenp CR0 comments.
>>  - 8241403: JavaThread::get_thread_name() should be ThreadSMR-aware
>
> Hi Dan,
> 
> Sorry but I have a lot of issues with this. After thinking about it a lot I 
> don't think the current approach is what is needed. To repeat what I wrote in 
> one of the comments I think the simple fix here is to replace the use of 
> Threads_lock in the caller with suitable use of a TLH, and then replace the 
> assert_locked_or_safepoint(Threads_lock) with 
> assert(is_JavaThread_protected(t)) where is_JavaThread_protected checks the 
> target for either being the current thread or included in a TLH of the 
> current thread. I don't think get_thread_name() should try to protect the 
> target as that is the responsibility of the caller.
> 
> Thanks,
> David

@dholmes-ora - I'm really glad that I waited for your review! Thanks for taking 
the time.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2535

Reply via email to