On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:22:28 GMT, Richard Reingruber <rr...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> My comment was about JVMTI_ERROR_THREAD_NOT_ALIVE > > Sure. I agree with your comment. I think we should add JVMTI_ERROR_THREAD_SUSPENDED as @reinrich says, it is possible for someone to sneak in a second suspend request before us. @dcubed-ojdk it seem like we could be posting JvmtiExport::post_monitor_contended_enter() from the ensure_join() which locks the threadObj. So it might be best to treat this the same way as the others? ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3191
