Thanks for the review Patricio.

David

On 1/07/2021 1:57 am, Patricio Chilano Mateo wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 01:31:30 GMT, David Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:

Please see the JBS issue for more details, but basically we have 8 different 
kinds of internal VM JavaThreads (grouping the three types of CompilerThread 
together) that all basically duplicated the logic for initializing (preparing 
is the term we use for user-defined JavaThreads) and starting the new thread. 
This common code can be factored out into static helpers in JavaThread.

This change does not look at the way the java.lang.Thread instance is created - 
that will be handled by a separate RFE.

The semantics of the changes are not identical, but I don't believe there is any 
observable change in behaviour. The scope of holding the Threads_lock has been reduced, 
and we now create the JavaThread instances ("new XXXThread(...)") outside of 
the lock. As far as I can see nothing in the construction process needs to happen under 
the Threads_lock.

A few of the threads use a static `_instance` field to hold a reference to the 
create JavaThread. This proved very difficult to handle, as logically the field 
would need to be updated in the middle of the new factored-out method: after 
setting all the fields but before releasing the newly started thread. I 
eventually realized that in all but one case those `_instance` fields are never 
used and so could be deleted. The one case remaining does not need to be set as 
I just described, but can be set after the thread has started, as the new 
thread does not examine it (arguably its existence is unnecessary).

The trickiest changes related to the CompilerThreads, so they need particular 
scrutiny.

Testing: tiers 1-3

Thanks,
David

David Holmes has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
commit since the last revision:

   Fixed copyright years in hpp files

Hi David,

Changes look good to me.

Thanks,
Patricio

-------------

Marked as reviewed by pchilanomate (Committer).

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4629

Reply via email to