On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:55:28 GMT, Evgeny Nikitin <eniki...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> This PR contains a relatively simple test which verifies that JVMTI-agents > are correctly informed about exceptions caught in C2-compiled code. The > 8269574 introduces pre-allocated exceptions in some paths, so the test tries > to produce a number of various exceptions and check that provided small JVMTI > agent got notified about all of them. test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/jvmti/TriggerBuiltinExceptionsTest.java line 128: > 126: > 127: Asserts.assertEQ( > 128: TriggerBuiltinExceptionsTest.caughtByJVMTIAgent(), > caughtByJavaTest, What is the reason to use the class name prefix for methods? : TriggerBuiltinExceptionsTest.compileMethodOrThrow TriggerBuiltinExceptionsTest.methodToCompile TriggerBuiltinExceptionsTest.caughtByJVMTIAgent It is not really needed, tight? ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5889
