On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 18:44:27 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Alex Menkov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
>> commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Chris's feedback
>
> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/hotswap/HS201/hs201t002.java
>  line 84:
> 
>> 82:         thread.start();
>> 83: 
>> 84:         // enable events requires live thread
> 
> I think a more detailed comment could be used here. Something like:
> 
> // setThread(thread) enables JVMTI events, and that can only be done on a 
> live thread,
> // so wait until the thread has started.

Fixed.

> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/hotswap/HS201/hs201t002/hs201t002.cpp
>  line 107:
> 
>> 105:     }
>> 106: 
>> 107:     if (!NSK_VERIFY(readNewBytecode(jvmti_env, newClassSize, 
>> newClassBytes))) {
> 
> For simple types I don't care for C++ pass-by-ref arguments. At the call site 
> it just looks like the values are being passed in. When I first read this it 
> didn't look right to me since they are uninitialized, so I had to look at 
> readNewBytecode() to see what was going on.

Changed arguments to pointers

> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/hotswap/HS201/hs201t002/hs201t002.cpp
>  line 368:
> 
>> 366:         if (threadName != NULL) {
>> 367:             jvmti->Deallocate((unsigned char*)threadName);
>> 368:         }
> 
> callbackException() and callbackExceptionCatch() seem to be identical other 
> than callbackException() taking a couple of extra unused arguments. They 
> should probably both just call a shared function.

Fixed

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7607

Reply via email to