On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 02:50:16 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> It seems it would be useful to support the verbose output with just a >>> single class that is specified, although that would suggest that the dcmd >>> name should then be something other than `VM.classes`. >> >> This is a good idea, but `jcmd VM.classes verbose=XX` looks strange, `jcmd >> VM.class XX` is also not much proper, because we desire to print all classes >> in default(`jcmd VM.class`). an alternative is to use `jcmd VM.classes >> verbose | grep XX` currently. > >> > It seems it would be useful to support the verbose output with just a >> > single class that is specified, although that would suggest that the dcmd >> > name should then be something other than `VM.classes`. >> >> This is a good idea, but `jcmd VM.classes verbose=XX` looks strange, `jcmd >> VM.class XX` is also not much proper, because we desire to print all classes >> in default(`jcmd VM.class`). an alternative is to use `jcmd VM.classes >> verbose | grep XX` currently. > > I was thinking the syntax would look like: `jcmd VM.classes [verbose > [classname]]` > > Your grep solution doesn't work because each class has multiple lines of > output. @plummercj Can you please help review this from the serviceability point of view? Thanks in advance! ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7105
