On Mon, 7 Mar 2022 14:42:56 GMT, Thomas Stuefe <stu...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> I find the naming a bit misleading. You use this as initialization, so I > would call it "init" something. You're correct. > AFAIU we use this to initialize wxstate for newly attached threads to "dont > execute". But should this not already be the case? No, it does not seem to be the case: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/41991 (and the man page does not give a default value either) > And if its not - e.g. because that thread had been calling into another > library that also does call generated code - is it not impolite to switch the > state to "executable false"? I know this is highly unlikely, I just try to > understand. This might be an issue when calling another library with a JIT. But this seems to be highly unlikely. Especially as this would have already been an issue. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7727
