On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:05:39 GMT, Joe Darcy <da...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> To enable more complete doclint checking (courtesy @jonathan-gibbons), 
>> please review this PR to add type-level @param tags where they are missing.
>> 
>> To the maintainers of java.util.concurrent, those changes could be separated 
>> out in another bug if that would ease maintenance of that code.
>> 
>> Making these library fixes is a blocker for correcting and expanding the 
>> doclint checks (JDK-8285496).
>> 
>> I'll update copyright years before pushing.
>
> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge 
> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in 
> by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains seven additional commits since 
> the last revision:
> 
>  - Update copyright years.
>  - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8285676
>  - Respond to more review feedback.
>  - Respond to more review feedback.
>  - Respond to review feedback.
>  - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8285676
>  - JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and 
> interfaces

src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/ref/PhantomReference.java line 48:

> 46:  * The {@link #refersTo(Object) refersTo} method can be used to test
> 47:  * whether some object is the referent of a phantom reference.
> 48:  * @param<T> the type of the referent

Shouldn't there be a space after `@param` ?

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8410

Reply via email to