On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 17:42:35 GMT, Matias Saavedra Silva <matsa...@openjdk.org> 
wrote:

>> The current structure used to store the resolution information for 
>> invokedynamic, ConstantPoolCacheEntry, is difficult to interpret due to its 
>> ambigious fields f1 and f2. This structure can hold information for fields, 
>> methods, and invokedynamics and each of its fields can hold different types 
>> of values depending on the entry. 
>> 
>> This enhancement proposes a new structure to exclusively contain 
>> invokedynamic information in a manner that is easy to interpret and easy to 
>> extend.  Resolved invokedynamic entries will be stored in an array in the 
>> constant pool cache and the operand of the invokedynamic bytecode will be 
>> rewritten to be the index into this array.
>> 
>> Any areas that previously accessed invokedynamic data from 
>> ConstantPoolCacheEntry will be replaced with accesses to this new array and 
>> structure. Verified with tier1-9 tests.
>> 
>> The PPC was provided by @reinrich and the RISCV port was provided by 
>> @DingliZhang and @zifeihan.
>> 
>> This change supports the following platforms: x86, aarch64, PPC, and RISCV
>
> Matias Saavedra Silva has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Improved comment for load-acquire aarch64

src/hotspot/cpu/ppc/templateTable_ppc_64.cpp line 2294:

> 2292: 
> 2293:   __ load_resolved_indy_entry(cache, index);
> 2294:   __ ld_ptr(method, in_bytes(ResolvedIndyEntry::method_offset()), 
> cache);

@reinrich this load needs acquire semantics.

src/hotspot/cpu/ppc/templateTable_ppc_64.cpp line 2308:

> 2306:   // Update registers with resolved info
> 2307:   __ load_resolved_indy_entry(cache, index);
> 2308:   __ ld_ptr(method, in_bytes(ResolvedIndyEntry::method_offset()), 
> cache);

@reinrich same for this one.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12778#discussion_r1146343430
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12778#discussion_r1146343487

Reply via email to