On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 14:43:04 GMT, Matias Saavedra Silva <matsa...@openjdk.org> 
wrote:

>> The current structure used to store the resolution information for 
>> invokedynamic, ConstantPoolCacheEntry, is difficult to interpret due to its 
>> ambigious fields f1 and f2. This structure can hold information for fields, 
>> methods, and invokedynamics and each of its fields can hold different types 
>> of values depending on the entry. 
>> 
>> This enhancement proposes a new structure to exclusively contain 
>> invokedynamic information in a manner that is easy to interpret and easy to 
>> extend.  Resolved invokedynamic entries will be stored in an array in the 
>> constant pool cache and the operand of the invokedynamic bytecode will be 
>> rewritten to be the index into this array.
>> 
>> Any areas that previously accessed invokedynamic data from 
>> ConstantPoolCacheEntry will be replaced with accesses to this new array and 
>> structure. Verified with tier1-9 tests.
>> 
>> The PPC was provided by @reinrich and the RISCV port was provided by 
>> @DingliZhang and @zifeihan.
>> 
>> This change supports the following platforms: x86, aarch64, PPC, and RISCV
>
> Matias Saavedra Silva has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   RISCV patch and aarch64 improvement

`{tier1, tier2} X {fast debug, slow debug, release}` testing done for s390x. PR 
seems clean.
@matias9927 please include port for s390x from this commit: 
https://github.com/offamitkumar/jdk/commit/a582f32f97aefba33cebaf4ace540681dfc0eff5

Thanks

src/hotspot/cpu/ppc/templateInterpreterGenerator_ppc.cpp line 652:

> 650:     // Scale the index to be the entry index * 
> sizeof(ResolvedInvokeDynamicInfo)
> 651:     __ sldi(size, size, log2i_exact(sizeof(ResolvedIndyEntry)));
> 652:     __ add(cache, cache, size);

@reinrich Is there any specific reason, why you're not calling 
load_resolved_indy_entry() method here.  On s390x build/changes are stable even 
with calling that helper method.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by amitkumar (Author).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12778#pullrequestreview-1361010070
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12778#discussion_r1150566670

Reply via email to