On Thu, 26 Feb 2026 08:39:20 GMT, Dean Long <[email protected]> wrote:
> 3. method handle invoke, esp += 1 for membername > As far as I can tell, this PR changes the meaning of unextended_sp be > an aligned version of esp. > Using this value on method return means SP no longer includes worst > case stack size based on max_stack, > so growing esp can now exceed SP. But we should have asserts for > that, so I probably got something wrong. I wondered about that. It should be easy enough to prove it with a test case. In addition, I don't know that this PR is trying to fix a real problem. It's just an assertion. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29744#issuecomment-3965801743
