> This is a "*sub-review pull request*" for the first 
> [preview](https://openjdk.org/jeps/12) of [JEP 401: Value Classes and 
> Objects](https://openjdk.org/jeps/401), specifically 
> [JDK-8317278](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8317278): JVM 
> implementation of value classes and objects.
> 
>> [!NOTE]
>> This pull request and the other sub-review pull requests listed below are 
>> based on the "*master pull request*" 
>> (https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/31120). It contains the same full set 
>> of code changes as the "*master pull request*" to preserve the full 
>> implementation context; the language compiler, JVM, and standard library 
>> changes are intertwined. This separate pull requests exist only to subdivide 
>> the review and related discussion by area.
> 
> Other areas for review:
> 
> - [JDK-8317277](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8317277): Java language 
> implementation of value classes and objects
>   - https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/31121
> - [JDK-8317279](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8317279): Standard 
> library implementation of value classes and objects
>   - https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/31123
> 
> Code changes resulting from the review process should be made in 
> [`valhalla/lworld`](https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla/).
> 
> `valhalla/lworld` is currently updated from `jdk/master` whenever a weekly 
> [`jdk` tag](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/tags) is created. At that time, 
> code changes from `valhalla/lworld` will be propagated to the master pull 
> request and to all sub-review pull requests, including this one.
> 
> Ultimately, review sign-off will be recorded on the "*master pull request*", 
> and this pull request will be closed without integration.
> 
> This pull request has a large code surface area and often conflicts with 
> `jdk/master` on a daily basis. Refer to 
> [`valhalla/lworld`](https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla/) for the latest 
> state of the project code, keeping in mind that it may lag several days 
> behind `jdk/master`. Both repositories may be needed as references during 
> review.
> 
> ---------
> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK 
> Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).

David Simms has updated the pull request incrementally with 11 additional 
commits since the last revision:

 - Merge branch '8317277' into jep401_sub_review_8317278
 - Merge remote-tracking branch 'valhalla/lworld' into 8317277
 - 8387703: [lworld] address batch of comments in mainline PR
   
   Co-authored-by: Tobias Hartmann <[email protected]>
   Reviewed-by: thartmann, dlong
 - 8387661: [lworld] move generate_return_value_stub() to SharedRuntime
   
   Reviewed-by: adinn, thartmann
 - 8387405: [lworld] is_always_flat_in_array should be always false
   
   Reviewed-by: thartmann
 - 8387686: [lworld] Update the JNI specification version for value types
   
   Reviewed-by: alanb, dsimms
 - 8387726: [lworld] JVMTI/JDWP/JDI docs cleanup
   
   Reviewed-by: sspitsyn, cjplummer
 - 8387673: [lworld] C2: clone() intrinsic does not throw 
CloneNotSupportedException for value classes not implementing Cloneable
   
   Reviewed-by: thartmann
 - 8387709: [lworld] Split Valhalla tests from tier1_compiler_3 to avoid task 
timeouts
   
   Reviewed-by: chagedorn
 - 8387350: [lworld] ObjectOutputStream.writeObject() doesn't throw 
InvalidClassException for Serializable instance with strict init fields
   
   Reviewed-by: alanb, jpai, thartmann
 - ... and 1 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/f1f6d35d...1b6f7c18

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31122/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31122/files/f1f6d35d..1b6f7c18

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=31122&range=08
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=31122&range=07-08

  Stats: 1379 lines in 54 files changed: 777 ins; 518 del; 84 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31122.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/31122/head:pull/31122

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31122

Reply via email to