serviceability-dev

Messages by Thread

- Re: RFR: 8357828: Add a timestamp to jcmd diagnostic commands Thomas Stuefe
- Re: RFR: 8357828: Add a timestamp to jcmd diagnostic commands Laurence Cable
- Re: RFR: 8357828: Add a timestamp to jcmd diagnostic commands Thomas Stuefe
- Re: RFR: 8357828: Add a timestamp to jcmd diagnostic commands Ivan Bereziuk
- Re: RFR: 8357828: Add a timestamp to jcmd diagnostic commands Larry Cable
- Re: RFR: 8357828: Add a timestamp to jcmd diagnostic commands Ivan Bereziuk
- Re: RFR: 8357828: Add a timestamp to jcmd diagnostic commands Laurence Cable
- Re: RFR: 8357828: Add a timestamp to jcmd diagnostic commands Alan Bateman
RFR: 8367983: javax/management/monitor/ThreadPoolTest.java and StartStopTest.java fail with Unexpected Maximum Pool Size Overflow! Kevin Walls
Re: RFR: 8365732: RISC-V: implement AES CTR intrinsics [v9] Anjian Wen
Re: RFR: 8365732: RISC-V: implement AES CTR intrinsics [v7] Anjian Wen
RFR: 8368159: Significant performance overhead when started with jdwp agent and unattached debugger Serguei Spitsyn
RFR: 8366941: Excessive logging in serviceability tests causes timeout Ioi Lam
RFR: 8368094: Fix problem list errors Magnus Ihse Bursie
- Re: RFR: 8368094: Fix problem list errors David Holmes
- Re: RFR: 8368094: Fix problem list errors Daniel D . Daugherty
- Re: RFR: 8368094: Fix problem list errors Chris Plummer
- Re: RFR: 8368094: Fix problem list errors SendaoYan
- Integrated: 8368094: Fix problem list errors Magnus Ihse Bursie
RFR: 8361955: [GCC static analyzer] libjdwp/threadControl.c threadControl_setPendingInterrupt error: dereference of NULL 'node' Chris Plummer
RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Matthias Baesken
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Christoph Langer
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Martin Doerr
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Erik Joelsson
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Matthias Baesken
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Phil Race
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Erik Joelsson
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Matthias Baesken
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Matthias Baesken
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Magnus Ihse Bursie
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Martin Doerr
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Alexey Ivanov
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Magnus Ihse Bursie
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Matthias Baesken
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Magnus Ihse Bursie
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Jorn Vernee
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs [v2] Erik Joelsson
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Matthias Baesken
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs [v2] Matthias Baesken
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs [v2] Martin Doerr
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs [v2] Matthias Baesken
- Integrated: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Matthias Baesken
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs [v3] Matthias Baesken
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs [v3] Magnus Ihse Bursie
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs [v3] Matthias Baesken
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs [v3] Alexey Ivanov
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs [v3] Magnus Ihse Bursie
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs [v3] Matthias Baesken
- Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs [v3] Alexey Ivanov
RFR: 8367318: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/MethodEntryRequest/addClassFilter_rt/filter_rt001/TestDescription.java timed out after passing Chris Plummer
JDK-8020207, jconsole fails connecting over SSL Gennadiy Krivoshein
RFR: 8367927: Remove 8043571-related tests from problemlists Leonid Mesnik
- Re: RFR: 8367927: Remove 8043571-related tests from problemlists David Holmes
- Re: RFR: 8367927: Remove 8043571-related tests from problemlists Serguei Spitsyn
- Re: RFR: 8367927: Remove 8043571-related tests from problemlists Leonid Mesnik
- Integrated: 8367927: Remove 8043571-related tests from problemlists Leonid Mesnik
RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures Matthew Donovan
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures Matthew Donovan
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures Artur Barashev
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures Artur Barashev
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures [v2] Matthew Donovan
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures [v2] Artur Barashev
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures Artur Barashev
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures [v2] Matthew Donovan
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures [v2] Artur Barashev
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures [v3] Matthew Donovan
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures [v3] Artur Barashev
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures [v3] Matthew Donovan
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures [v3] Artur Barashev
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures [v3] Artur Barashev
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures [v4] Matthew Donovan
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures [v5] Matthew Donovan
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures [v5] Artur Barashev
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures [v5] Daniel Jeliński
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures [v5] Daniel Fuchs
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures [v5] Matthew Donovan
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures [v5] Matthew Donovan
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures [v6] Matthew Donovan
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures [v6] Daniel Jeliński
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures [v7] Matthew Donovan
- Re: RFR: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures [v7] Daniel Jeliński
- Integrated: 8353738: Update TLS unit tests to not use certificates with MD5 signatures Matthew Donovan
RFR: 8367614: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/stress/serial/heapwalking001/TestDescription.java failed, passed and timed-out Chris Plummer
RFR: 8367725: Incorrect reading of oop in SuspendResumeManager::suspend while thread is blocked Leonid Mesnik
RFR: 8362561: Remove diagnostic option AllowArchivingWithJavaAgent Ioi Lam
- Re: RFR: 8362561: Remove diagnostic option AllowArchivingWithJavaAgent David Holmes
- Re: RFR: 8362561: Remove diagnostic option AllowArchivingWithJavaAgent Albert Mingkun Yang
- Re: RFR: 8362561: Remove diagnostic option AllowArchivingWithJavaAgent Serguei Spitsyn
- Re: RFR: 8362561: Remove diagnostic option AllowArchivingWithJavaAgent [v2] Ioi Lam
- Re: RFR: 8362561: Remove diagnostic option AllowArchivingWithJavaAgent [v2] Ioi Lam
- Re: RFR: 8362561: Remove diagnostic option AllowArchivingWithJavaAgent [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
- Re: RFR: 8362561: Remove diagnostic option AllowArchivingWithJavaAgent [v2] Ioi Lam
- Re: RFR: 8362561: Remove diagnostic option AllowArchivingWithJavaAgent [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
- Re: RFR: 8362561: Remove diagnostic option AllowArchivingWithJavaAgent [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
- Integrated: 8362561: Remove diagnostic option AllowArchivingWithJavaAgent Ioi Lam
RFR: 8367719: Refactor JNI code that uses class_to_verify_considering_redefinition() Ioi Lam
RFR: 8367656: Refactor Constantpool's operand array into two Johan Sjölen
- Re: RFR: 8367656: Refactor Constantpool's operand array into two David Holmes
- Re: RFR: 8367656: Refactor Constantpool's operand array into two Johan Sjölen
- Re: RFR: 8367656: Refactor Constantpool's operand array into two Johan Sjölen
- Re: RFR: 8367656: Refactor Constantpool's operand array into two Johan Sjölen
- Re: RFR: 8367656: Refactor Constantpool's operand array into two Johan Sjölen
- Re: RFR: 8367656: Refactor Constantpool's operand array into two [v3] David Holmes