I've a question about servicemix-jsr181. Why does a service implementation bean have to explicitly implement a service endpoint interface? According to the jsr181 spec, an implementation bean/class doesn't have to explicit;y state "implements whatever_ineterface".
I created some ws using jaxws2.0 directly from java classes which are the implementation beans. I used their "wsgen" to generate all the artifacts, and then deployed the wars files in Tomcat. Magically, jaxws2.0 will generate a wsdl for me. Even though the type or class of the paramters of an operation in those wsdl doesn't match those I declared in my implementation beans, jaxws2.0 knows ow to convert them. But not with servicemix's xfire. Why? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jsr181%3A-Why-does-a-service-implementation-bean-have-to-explicitly-implement-a-service-endpoint-interface--tf4393162s12049.html#a12526022 Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
