How about just making the current SUs into SEs? I believe if you need the benefit of the JBI's lifecycle management you'll have to go this route. I don't think there is anything preventing you from doing so.
You will actually get more bootstrap support than with the LW-container. http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/hello-world-se.html Kit > From: Kit Plummer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 06:50:20 -0700 > To: <[email protected]> > Conversation: Bean components and lifecycle > Subject: Re: Bean components and lifecycle > > Hey Aaron. > > I'm not sure I understand how. I do understand the need to get off the > LW-Container (non-JBI) - but, not sure about the 'bean' component part. Can > you explain a bit more that the objective is? JBI-compliance? > > The SUs really are just wrapped POJOs correct? > > Kit > > >> From: Aaron Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: <[email protected]> >> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:45:28 -0700 >> To: <[email protected]> >> Subject: Bean components and lifecycle >> >> Is there an equivalent to the ComponentLifeCycle interface for bean >> components? We're migrating our SUs from lw containers to bean >> components. It looks like the life cycle stuff will be a bit different. >> >> Thanks! >> Aaron >> >> > >
