Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
>Geoff Soutter wrote:
>> [snip]
>> What bugs me about this whole buffering thing is that the buffering
scheme I
>> have written for 2.0/2.1 servlets works just as well as the one in 2.2.
>> However, the things that only the servlet API could do for buffering were
>> not included... e.g. buffering a RD.include() and letting me extract the
>> results from the buffer. :-(
>>
>
>That one (post-processing included output) is a *whole* different kettle of
>fish -- which has triggered lots of discussion and debate over the lifetime
of
>the servlet API. Look back in the archives at all the flamewar message
threads
>about "servlet chaining" to see what I mean. :-)
hmmm, isn't servlet chaining where you can set the servlet engine up to
automatically "filter" requests through multiple servlets? I always thought
that was a crock... I'm suggesting a kind of "manual" version where it's all
under the explicit control of the coder... certainly servlet chaining was
around a long time before RD.include() !
Cheers
Geoff
___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
