On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Mark Galbreath wrote:
> Okay I removed the <reply to> from my email config. This means that
> a <reply to> is going to go directly to the interest group. I think
> this is wrong, but in the face of overwhelming peer-pressure, I will
> conform. :-)
[ ... ]
You *will* be assimilated!
Seriously, there may be reasonable disagreement over whether having a
Reply-To: back to the list is the right way to go, but I don't think
having your own Reply-To: is the way to deal with it. If that's what
the list decides, then I think you need to abide by it. Else you risk
causing more confusion/problems, as evidenced here. Some of the lists
I'm on do it this way (i.e. a Reply-To: back to the list), some don't.
FWIW, I prefer it this way. Although with my mailer (Pine, on UNIX,
but it's available for PCs :-), I like the way it handles either of
these options, and it's not much different either way.
Milt Epstein
Research Programmer
Software/Systems Development Group
Computing and Communications Services Office (CCSO)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
