If you see in deep it implements the OO concepts and designed in a NEW way to
fly in the WEB. So, there is no doubt it's NEW.
Of course it extends the C++ (syntax).
Regards
G S Sundaram
Purav wrote:
> Java is not NEW. its extends C++
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: A mailing list for discussion about Sun Microsystem's Java Servlet
> API Technology. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Thompson, Willard (GTICCC)
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 5:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Helping Sun against MS
>
> MS is a good company. However, if they have committed a crime - which I
> believe they did but I don't know the details, then instead of breaking up
> the company I think a more appropriate punishment would be to have them
> release ALL of their source code and design tactics so that others can
> benefit AND to restrict the amount of sales to hardware companies (if that's
> legal) - this would be the best counter/penalty for a monopoly. Just some
> food for thought, just like the ancient Romans, MS never came up with
> anything *new* they just make existing things better. Sun came up with
> something new JAVA. C# is just C++ and Java put together.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Rivera-Franqui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 7:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Helping Sun against MS
>
> Hi everyone!
>
> By now you might have heard that Microsoft has decided to stop including
> the Java Virtual Machine in their operating systems. In my opinion,
> this is due in part to Sun's inability to see that January's ruling
> would have had this effect, since the Microsoft tantrum is that if MS
> can't have it or control it, they're either going to buy it or they are
> going to develop some new product to compete with it and use any means
> possible to gain a monopoly in the market. Microsoft is preparing to
> unveil C#, and Java stands in its way, so they're going to try to
> prevent users from using Java, or at least make it difficult for them to
> use it.
>
> I've read about three articles today about these news, and from what
> I've collected from these articles is that MS will let the JVM intact
> for upgrades, will let consumers download their discontinued and
> deprecated JVM (someday it will not be available anymore) if a browser
> goes to a web page that uses Java, and MS seems to have plans to
> completely replace Java with C#.
>
> While I feel that Microsoft's actions are more proof that they've no
> real interest in helping consumers, I'll leave my opinion aside in this
> email and its subject.
>
> I believe that Java developers must take action in helping Sun maintain
> its Virtual Machine readily available in all operating systems. I'm
> willing to form a group of developers willing to write to major computer
> software distributors (i.e. people that sell Windows XP) to tell them to
> include a CD or diskettes with a major NON-MS virtual machine for
> consumers. Also, it is needed for computer vendors (i.e. companies like
> Dell, Gateway, Compaq) to install a virtual machine on ALL of the
> computers they sell to companies and individuals. One strong argument
> is that in order to better serve their customers, a Java Virtual Machine
> is essential.
>
> I also believe that a non-MS Virtual Machine should be used, since C#'s
> release is near and MS might supply customers with a defective Virtual
> Machine in order to prevent users from having a competent use of Java,
> and forcing them to use C#. This sounds paranoid, but MS has been known
> to use similar tactics to force users to use their products.
>
> Please, reply and tell me what you think of this initiative and what
> other ideas might be useful. We should not let Microsoft keep
> manipulating the computer industry and its users.
>
> Sincerely,
> Daniel Rivera-Franqui
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
> of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
>
> Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
> Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
> LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
> of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
>
> Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
> Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
> LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
> of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
>
> Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
> Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
> LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
