James Wilson wrote:
>
> I have to senerios in mind -- what do you
> guys think?
>
> Case 1:
> You have a servlet engine on box A and
> a servlet engine on box B. Then you create
> a HTTP POST/GET connection from box A to box B.
>
> Case 2:
> You have a servlet engine on box A and
> a RMI server on box B. Then you communicate
> from the box A to the RMI server via RMI.
>
I personally like case 2 better mostly
because of maintenance issues. With RMI you
only have to deal with setting up the rmi registry
which is a one line script. With the servlet to
servlet communication you have to have a servlet
engine which can be time consuming to maintain
whichever engine you choose. I find that I
spend about 3 times longer supporting servlet
engines than I do rmi registry.
> Thanks in advance for your thoughts!
>
> James
>
>
Hank
___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
