Milt Epstein wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Cervenka, Tom wrote: > > > What does a "turing machine" drawing of a web application look like? > > I'm wondering if he meant finite state automaton or state diagram. A > Turing Machine seems like overkill (plus it'd be harder to draw :-).
A turing machin ain't hard to draw. A simple magnet-tape and a io-head :-) The program would be the hard thing.... But for the question: You are not forced to program the old C-style as Olaf Jahn alludet to. You can apply your OO knowledge, for instance to have hierarchically structured data in your session. SUN itself gave us another knowhow resources, i.e. the J2EE patterns for presentation tier. Those are not only usefull with EJB. On the other hand there are some higher level frameworks (cocoon and stuff) But the mere use of a higher level framework will not prevent anyone from coding big heap of crap. It's always the "Use what, when, why and how" thats importand. Peter ___________________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST". Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
