It was an early mistake by the JavaDoc writers; it's redundant.
-----Original Message-----
From: A mailing list for discussion about Sun Microsystem's Java Servlet API
Technology. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Boda,
Ramakrishna Rao (Ramakrishna)
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Abstract Interface ??
Hi All !
In the API , ServletRequest Interface is mentioned as
public abstract interface ServletRequest {
}
. A class can be an abstract class , if it has got abstract ( to be
improved ) methods . But abstract interface is not making much sense to me
. Any way all the interfaces need to be implemented by some classes . Then
why this interface was declared specifically as abstract interface ?
Any ideas ?
Thanks
Boda
___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
