Please note that the following information is reposted from the Ars Technica
Team Lamb Chop (TLC) website as a service to those list members who may not
regularly visit them or the newsgroups for project updates and information.

Many thanks to the dedicated TLC members and SETI@home staffers who devote
many, many hours of hard work in the keeping the communications channels
open and the project moving forward in an upbeat, positive manner ;^) .

Reference Links:
Team Lamb Chop @ http://tlc.hagabard.com/ .
The Petition to SETI@home @
http://www.mindspring.com/~johnfrancis/PETITION.htm .

--
Jeffrey Ottie


==================================================
Petition

There has been a petition floating around concerning what some call a lack
of activity over at the S@H offices <SNIP> Eric Korpela came through today
with a response to the petition on alt.sci.seti.  I will let him tell you
about it all:

>It's a respectful petition.  I hope it's feasible to implement the
>recommendations ie there's the manpower to do it.

Unfortunately, it isn't yet feasable to do much of what the petition
requests.
You may not have noticed, but we've had a significant amount of problems and
down time in the last month, including restoring both the online science
database and the "master" database from backup.  That has basically put us
at a standstill in postprocessing for more than a month.  A couple months
ago I would have projected that we'd be at the point of having click-plots
for all of the data analyzed so far, and would be well on the way to
generating maps of double and triple detections.  At this point, I'd say
we're still months away from that point.  Because of the server reliability
problems we've been having, we're considering a change to the online server
that would increase reliability at the price of slowing down the
post-processing.

In response to the specific points:

1) The question of which of the 2 billion or so signals is "interesting"
depends upon us getting to the point of making maps of double and triple
detections and stellar coincidences.  As the "top 20" pages show, sorting by
power or chisquared leads to a page dominated by entirely uninteresting
signals.   Every signal in the top 20 pages is either RFI or a computational
error. The list of potentially interesting signals is currently endless.  A
lot of reduction still needs to be done before we can publish a real list of
"interesting" candidates.

2) The science newsletters are a resonable indication of the status of the
postprocessing.  We were at a virtual standstill prior to the start of this
year because our databases were overloaded.  Installation of the "master"
database machine early this year has sped postprocessing by orders of
magnitude.  Currently the redundancy checkers and the clickplot generators
are running.  The next two steps, frequency correction and zone RFI removal
are waiting until there is a significant clean dataset in the master
database.  They should start shortly.  I expect that a science newsletter
will be released regarding these steps.  Following that there will be an
iteration of repeat finders and more complex RFI rejection. Following the
first iteration, we should be able to produce a list of interesting
candidates that has less than a billion items on it.

3) I'm not sure the word numerous really applies to our security breaches.
To date there has been one instance of a comprimise of the security of our
systems (the Alf hack), and one hack that exploited the RPC the client uses
to get user information.   I get the point, however.  I will suggest to
David that he implement a password change CGI.  Should SETI@home II come to
pass there will also be a client password to prevent unauthorized users from
returning results using your accounts.

4) We've kicked around the idea of milestone recognition for some time, with
the usual idea being small gifts that increasing in value to with number of
work units completed.   In general we've been too overwhelmed with daily
operations to implement anything.  We've also considered that providing
another incentive to cheat might not be the best thing to do at this point.
I find it difficult to believe that any milestone recognition would be a
source of revenue.

Above all, everyone should be aware of how limited a resource the time of
the members of the team here at Berkeley.  Because of other constraints I've
had to reduce my SETI@home time to about 30% (which tends to be about 20
hours a week).  I'm recently back from my third trip to Korea in the last
nine months.  Of course my departure marks the point at which all hell broke
loose.  I'm about 4 weeks behind in answering SETI@home related email.  If
any of us had an extra 8 hours a month to write a newsletter (a much better
estimate than 30 minutes, this email is taking longer than that) we'd do it.
It's not that we aren't appreciative of your collective efforts.  We just
don't have the time to express it.

Right now our effort are dominated by keeping S@H running.  Post processing
is the second priority, and that's where signal information you seek would
be generated.  The third priority is trying to make sure that SETI@home will
continue. None of these tasks are easy.  All of them consume more man hours
than we have available.

Well, it's time for me to get back to work.  There's a problem with one of
the science database that cause the failure of one program last week.  I
should be fixing it...

Eric

==================================================

==
Unsubscribe instructions: http://www.talkspace.net/mlists/setiathome.html
This list sponsored by talkspace.net: building space communities online.
Mailing list services provided by klx.communications -- www.klx.com

Reply via email to