Explorer,seti@home, and systray and puilling 32 hrs. 256 megs of ram. Ran tests at 256,192,128, and 64 megs and my lowest time was 26 hrs I think? My K6/2 was a cxt core. Hitting the web, and they say it's good. In personal experience? bad. My Cxt had a 64k cache. And looking on Setispy? They show 128k to 512k cache.....
Maybe I got ripped on my k6/2..... Broc Olson < Byark!> ----- Original Message ----- From: Ablemonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 5:54 AM Subject: Re: Difference in WU's > > > Strange. When I had my K6-2/500 (128mb ram, ALI mobo) running SETI my > average times > were generally around 19 hours, not in the 30s. Are you sure you had no > other overhead > or no other reasons for the slow times? > Andy == Unsubscribe instructions: http://www.talkspace.net/mlists/setiathome.html This list sponsored by talkspace.net: building space communities online. Mailing list services provided by klx.communications -- www.klx.com
