I tried the cli last year and found no difference in speed.
Art On Sun, 17 Mar 2002 08:47:25 -0500 "Tom Schoenherr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > I have not found what you are saying about CLI vs GUI to be true. > I've found the CLI to be approximately 25% faster than the GUI. > > Subject: Re: SetiQueue > > > It's RDRAM. If you're wondering about whether that is responsible > for the > short processing time, I'd guess not: across the spectrum of > machines that > I've run Seti@Home screensaver on, the processing time nicely > scales > (inversely) with CPU clock speed. The correlation is less good for > the CLI > client under SetiQueue. > > --howard > > > > == > Unsubscribe instructions: > http://www.talkspace.net/mlists/setiathome.html > This list sponsored by talkspace.net: building space communities > online. > Mailing list services provided by klx.communications -- www.klx.com > > ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/. == Unsubscribe instructions: http://www.talkspace.net/mlists/setiathome.html This list sponsored by talkspace.net: building space communities online. Mailing list services provided by klx.communications -- www.klx.com
