I don't know nothing about dzhandle, but I know there is a ZopeSkel template (called plone_hosting, I think, but check its name with paster create -list_templates), which creates a zeo instance.
So, I can't give you a comparison between both solutions, but if your only pending issue with buildout was to create a zeoserver, I think you should check that out. On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:57 PM, athomerson <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have built several Plone 2.5 sites on a Debian server and I have been > using > dzhandle to do it. Now I am starting to do some development with Plone 3.2 > and I have used buildout on my laptop. I like both tools and having > followed a number of threads on the advantages of buildout I would be happy > to bite the bullet and build production sites on my Debian server using > buildout. I would like to use the dzhandle recipe that was written by > Bluedynamics, but it doesn't support building zeoservers. I could build > the > zeoserver using dzhandle and the zope clients using buildout (and the > dzhandle recipe), but I would like to add blob support with plone.app.blob > and it really wants me to use buildout. I am looking for a little guidance > here. Should I abandon dzhandle and build everything with buildout? Is > dzhandle no longer the accepted way of building sites on Debian? > -- > View this message in context: > http://n2.nabble.com/buildout-or-dzhandle--tp2324037p2324037.html > Sent from the Installation, Setup, Upgrades mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > > _______________________________________________ > Setup mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/setup >
_______________________________________________ Setup mailing list [email protected] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/setup
