I would guess (having never used Relstorage) that for a site with only 35 users, the performance gains of Relstorage are not going to be relevant and that a standard ZEO-based deployment will be just fine.
:jon On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Maurits van Rees <[email protected]> wrote: > Op 24-03-11 21:03, nikolaj schreef: >> >> Ive tried Standalone with Data.fs and now managed to setup RelStorage with >> PostgreSQL, but Im in doubt - should I go with ZEO? >> >> Could someone please elaborate the pros and cons between RelStorage and >> ZEO. >> The setup is going to work for 35 users with EasyNewsletter, Ploneboard, >> Blog, Gallery, MS and PDF context search and WebDAV. > > Look at > http://pypi.python.org/pypi/RelStorage/1.5.0b2#features > Especially: > > - According to some tests, RelStorage handles high concurrency better than > the standard combination of ZEO and FileStorage. (It may be wise to run > some performance tests yourself.) > > - Whereas FileStorage takes longer to start as the database grows due to an > in-memory index of all objects, RelStorage starts quickly regardless of > database size. > > - Capable of failover to replicated SQL databases. > > A Data.fs is still the standard way to deploy Plone and no one will fault > you for doing so. Relstorage is a solid solution as well though, and I have > the feeling it is gaining more popularity. > > See also the zodb-dev mailing list for discussions on the zodb in either > filestorage or relstorage form: > https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev > (also available via gmane) > > Cheers, > > > -- > Maurits van Rees > Web App Programmer at Zest Software: http://zestsoftware.nl > Personal website: http://maurits.vanrees.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Setup mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/setup > _______________________________________________ Setup mailing list [email protected] https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/setup
