Yes, changes in networking-sfc would be needed, or another approach would be needed -- hence my comment about the unknown timing. Until that's all worked out, the plan is to stick with the current model/APIs.
Andre On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Brady Allen Johnson < brady.allen.john...@ericsson.com> wrote: > > Andre, > > I dont think networking-sfc will be able to communicate with ODL SFC until > they change their data models to be compliant with IETF SFC. > > Brady > > > > On 22/07/16 15:09, Andre Fredette wrote: > > Juanma, > > Someone else on the list can correct me if they think otherwise, but I > don't think it will be in Boron. The API question is a good one. There is > also an effort getting started to change Tacker so that instead of talking > directly to ODL, it communicates via networking-sfc and networking-odl. > This would likely result in some API changes, but I don't know about the > timing of things right now. > > Andre > > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Juan Manuel Fernandez < > juan.manuel.fernan...@ericsson.com> wrote: > >> Thanks Andre! >> >> >> >> Do you know if the plan is having it in Boron? >> >> >> >> When adding this SFC support, will VPN Service-based Netvirt keep old >> Netvirt REST API? >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> >> >> Juanma >> >> >> >> *From:* Andre Fredette [mailto:afrede...@redhat.com] >> *Sent:* viernes, 22 de julio de 2016 13:54 >> *To:* Juan Manuel Fernandez <juan.manuel.fernan...@ericsson.com> >> *Cc:* Sam Hague <sha...@redhat.com>; Brady Allen Johnson < >> brady.allen.john...@ericsson.com>; Dayavanti Gopal Kamath < >> dayavanti.gopal.kam...@ericsson.com>; netvirt-...@lists.opendaylight.org; >> sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org >> *Subject:* Re: [sfc-dev] [netvirt-dev] Integration App Coexistence >> without using Genius >> >> >> >> Juanma, >> >> The plan is to add SFC support to the new VPN Service-based NetVirt, >> which is using Genius. We're not planning to change the implementation in >> the old NetVirt at this time. >> >> Andre >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:13 AM, Juan Manuel Fernandez < >> juan.manuel.fernan...@ericsson.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Just one clarification on my questions below, I do not mean whether SFC >> Classifier in Netvirt is ported to Genius project, but whether SFC >> Classifier in Netvirt is ported to use Genius. >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> >> >> Juanma >> >> >> >> *From:* netvirt-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto: >> netvirt-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] *On Behalf Of *Juan Manuel >> Fernandez >> *Sent:* viernes, 22 de julio de 2016 10:59 >> *To:* Sam Hague <sha...@redhat.com>; Brady Allen Johnson < >> brady.allen.john...@ericsson.com>; Dayavanti Gopal Kamath < >> dayavanti.gopal.kam...@ericsson.com> >> *Cc:* netvirt-...@lists.opendaylight.org; sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org >> *Subject:* Re: [netvirt-dev] [sfc-dev] Integration App Coexistence >> without using Genius >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I guess that means SFC Classifier in Netvirt is not ported to Genius in >> Boron, are you thinking on porting it in Carbon? I’ve seen some Netvirt >> architecture slides talking about a possible integration of ACL service >> (which to my understanding is making use of Genius) with SFC, is my >> understanding correct? When that would happen? >> >> >> >> In SFC we are working on integrating SFC with Genius and the idea was >> having it for Boron. I guess we might find some incompatibilities between >> SFC using Genius and SFC Classifier in Netvirt. Netvirt, SFC, what is you >> view on that? >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> >> >> Juanma >> >> >> >> *From:* sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [ >> mailto:sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org >> <sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org>] *On Behalf Of *Sam Hague >> *Sent:* miércoles, 20 de julio de 2016 21:36 >> *To:* Brady Allen Johnson <brady.allen.john...@ericsson.com> >> *Cc:* netvirt-...@lists.opendaylight.org; sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org >> *Subject:* Re: [sfc-dev] Integration App Coexistence without using Genius >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Brady Allen Johnson < >> brady.allen.john...@ericsson.com> wrote: >> >> >> I have a question about the Netvirt and SFC integration that we did in >> Beryllium and how it will be affected by the Netvirt integration with >> Genius. >> >> In Beryllium, we implemented application coexistence by using table >> offsets and sharing table=0. Now, in Boron, Genius will take care of the >> application coexistence, but Im not sure how complete the SFC integration >> with Genius will be in Boron. So, if SFC is not integrated with Genius in >> Boron, will the Netvirt/SFC integration/AppCoexistence stop working? >> >> The old netvirt using the coexistence impl is still there so you can >> continue to use that feature as is. >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Brady >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sfc-dev mailing list >> sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org >> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sfc-dev mailing list >> sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org >> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev >> >> >> > > >
_______________________________________________ sfc-dev mailing list sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev
