Adding SFC and integration lists:
Thanks Yi!
So, SFC folks (Brady, Jaime, etc.) & Jamo - from Yi's email this issue does
seem "non-critical" - doesn't it? And we should mark the issue in the
spreadsheet to be "Okay" and pick up the CSIT test changes proposed by Yi for
SR1?
Descriptions of HTTP codes:
400 Bad Request
The server cannot or will not process the request due to an apparent client
error (e.g., malformed request syntax, size too large, invalid request message
framing, or deceptive request routing).
404 Not Found
The requested resource could not be found but may be available in the future.
Subsequent requests by the client are permissible.
Yi - the change you make the following change in the check to be from 404 to
400:
"Should Be Equal As Strings ${resp.status_code} 404"
Also question - should we wild card this check to catch both HTTP codes "400"
and "404"?
On 3/10/19, 8:33 PM, "Yi Yang -云服务集团 (杨燚)" <yangy...@inspur.com> wrote:
Thanks Jamo, I checked test log, it seems http return status code is
changed, http return status code is 404 before, but not it is 400 now, sfc has
not been changed very long, I submitted a gerrit change
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/80756/ and pushed a sandbox check for
sfc-csit-3node-docker-full-deploy-all-neon, you can take it to avoid sfc is
excluded in neon release.
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Abhijit Kumbhare [mailto:abhijit.kumbh...@ericsson.com]
发送时间: 2019年3月11日 10:06
收件人: Jamo Luhrsen <jluhr...@redhat.com>; Yi Yang (杨燚)-云服务集团
<yangy...@inspur.com>; Dayavanti Gopal Kamath
<dayavanti.gopal.kam...@ericsson.com>; ece...@gmail.com; vishnoia...@gmail.com;
ddelar...@luminanetworks.com; Faseela K <faseel...@ericsson.com>;
abe...@linuxfoundation.org; sha...@redhat.com; vtha...@redhat.com;
pgopan...@luminanetworks.com; bradyallenjohn...@gmail.com;
david.suarez.fuen...@gmail.com; jcaam...@suse.com
抄送: Nishant Saurabh <nishant.saur...@ericsson.com>
主题: Re: 答复: SFC project - maintenance mode or active
Understood.
On 3/10/19, 6:06 PM, "Jamo Luhrsen" <jluhr...@redhat.com> wrote:
Yi,
you need to use the logs server to see the logs, not the links from
jenkins. I know it's
not intuitive, but it helps our jenkins server keep up with things to
offload the logs.
here:
https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/sfc-csit-3node-docker-full-deploy-all-neon/201/robot-plugin/log.html.gz
As for the "non-critical" tag you saw Abhijit, that is just default for
robot to
show that. We don't use critical vs non-critical, so you can ignore it.
As for only 2 failures not being a big deal, that may be true, but the
reason we
are discussing is that those 2 failures are not there in fluorine, so
it's a regression
in neon and we try to avoid having regressions between releases.
Thanks to everyone for taking time out on their weekend.
JamO
On 3/10/19 5:33 PM, Yi Yang (杨燚)-云服务集团 wrote:
> I don't intend to fix it, but only 2 of 32 test cases are failed, so
they aren't big issues, anybody is still active in sfc project? I think it is
more reasonable to delay them to neon SR1.
>
> I can check the issues, but I'm not sure I can fix them because I
didn't develop it very long.
>
> BTW,
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/sfc-csit-3node-docker-full-deploy-all-neon/201/robot/report/report.html
and
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/sfc-csit-3node-docker-full-deploy-all-neon/201/robot/report/log.html
can't be accessed, can you help send correct links for failure log?
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Abhijit Kumbhare [mailto:abhijit.kumbh...@ericsson.com]
> 发送时间: 2019年3月11日 8:18
> 收件人: Jamo Luhrsen <jluhr...@redhat.com>; Dayavanti Gopal Kamath
<dayavanti.gopal.kam...@ericsson.com>; Luis Gomez Palacios <ece...@gmail.com>;
Anil Vishnoi <vishnoia...@gmail.com>; Daniel De La Rosa
<ddelar...@luminanetworks.com>; Faseela K <faseel...@ericsson.com>; Anil Belur
<abe...@linuxfoundation.org>; Sam Hague <sha...@redhat.com>; Vishal Thapar
<vtha...@redhat.com>; Prem Sankar Gopannan <pgopan...@luminanetworks.com>;
Brady Johnson <bradyallenjohn...@gmail.com>; Yi Yang (杨燚)-云服务集团
<yangy...@inspur.com>; David Suarez Fuentes <david.suarez.fuen...@gmail.com>;
Jaime Caamaño <jcaam...@suse.com>
> 抄送: Nishant Saurabh <nishant.saur...@ericsson.com>
> 主题: Re: SFC project - maintenance mode or active
>
> Adding some existing SFC members including Brady, David, Jaime and Yi
Yang. I know Yi is an advisory committer. Assuming Daya's team can fix it at a
later date (SR1 or some other SR and revive SFC), can one of you guys also
check how serious is the SFC CSIT failure? I had already sent an email about
this - with a chance for SFC to respond by Tuesday (but earlier will be better)
before we have to move it out of Neon.
>
> The sign-off sheet is here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sIoApv2fFp0wJcPK7m6lQDtjbUonRANrs5upSeD_DyI/edit#gid=147542669
>
> The CSIT failure that Jamo mentions is here:
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/sfc-csit-3node-docker-full-deploy-all-neon/201/.
>
>
_______________________________________________
sfc-dev mailing list
sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev
