Vivek,

See comments below from my quick skip through ...

Paul

Vivek T wrote:
> I have posted a webrev for package " jexcelapi" which I am porting to 
> OpenSolaris and would like to request a code review.
> 
>  Please see below link
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~vivekrt/6816361-jexcelapi/
> 
>  Let me know if any updates are required in the package files

1. usr/src/lib/jxl/METADATA
    Why not use the 'direct link' in the SRC: field ? ...
"http://kent.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/jexcelapi/jexcelapi_2_4_2.tar.gz";

    Is the URL link correct ? ...
      6 URL:  http://asm.objectweb.org/

2. usr/src/lib/jxl/Makefile.sfw
    Just an observation: having the version hard coded as
    2_4_2 does mean that you will have to update this file
    when ever you do a version update integration, so maybe
    you can find a way to get around this.

3. usr/src/lib/jxl/sunman/jexcelapi.3
    Says ...
      41 /usr/share/lib/java/jexcelapi-2.4.2.jar
    maybe that should say ...
         /usr/share/lib/java/jexcelapi.jar
    so you don't have to update it every version update.

4. Package name SUNWjxl
    Observation: Maybe the package name should be SUNWjexcelapi
    which would be more meaningful ?

5. usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWjxl/depend
    Lines ...
      55 P SUNWj5rt      JDK 1.5 run time environment
      56 P SUNWj5dev     JDK 1.5 development tools
    is this the right version of java ?

END
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Cunningham
Software Engineer
Tadpole Business Unit

Reply via email to