On Dec 5, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Mike.Sullivan at sun.com wrote: >> From sfwnv-discuss-bounces at opensolaris.org Fri Dec 5 11:44:00 2008 > >>> What does all this have to do with "code review?" Porting LaTeX is >>> out >>> of the scope for this project. We are trying to do the right thing >>> here >>> by trying to integrate a highly useful FOSS piece into OpenSolaris. >>> Piling on requirements like these are only going to delay or stop >>> the >>> project altogether. Are you sure that's what want? >> >> I'm 100% with Anup here. There is no chance what so ever that this >> group will port latex just beause the pyOpenSSL docs are in tex >> format. >> >> If the SFW C-Team requires this I will go as high up the management >> chain as I need to to get it overruled. > > ok. Though you probably should ask them first if it's a requirement, > before you threaten as I don't believe I've heard it being one.
Well, it seemed like Jim was speaking more on behalf of the C-team in this case. I am still at a loss as to what this particular issue he raised had to do with "code" review. > Certainly compiling code is. For docs I don't remember even being > asked that. I'd hope the projects would look at the docs and what > they need and decide whether the precreated docs are fine or they > need to generate them. Certainly I'd never tell anyone to go port > some form of TeX, I think I'd risk not being able to patch > documentation > easily. Cool. Thanks for clarifying, Mike. This project is due for a C-team review next week and we can clarify anything else regarding this at that time. Anup
