On 07/05/07, Stephen Hahn <sch at sun.com> wrote: > * Brian Gupta <brian.gupta at gmail.com> [2007-05-07 11:25]: > > --enable-all > > A reason would be helpful. For instance, "everybody ships it this > way, even though feature X doesn't work that well". My assumption > (and guidance to new integrators) is that the first integration of a > package should use the standard defaults, with enhancements later.
That was my initial reaction as well. Most of the time there are good reasons why --enable-all is not the default. Let's not unnecessarily increase the size of things :) -- "Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst binarycrusader at gmail.com - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
