FWIW, syslog-ng source is an easy (patch-free) compile on Solaris using gcc:

http://www.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/BuildRecipesReference#syslog-ng

And as such, has been integrated into the SFE (pkgbuild) repository.
However SFE is only a non-Sun community supported project.

Eric

On Wed, 23 May 2007, Brian Gupta wrote:
> Doh, wrong forum. I meant to drop it in sfwnv. (A mistake that I am
> correcting now). :)...
>
> Sorry for the confusion, and thanks for that smf link!! I didn't know
> about that wiki! (I've sent the link to a colleague for
> consideration.)
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
>
> On 5/23/07, Stephen Hahn <sch at sun.com> wrote:
>> * Brian Gupta <brian.gupta at gmail.com> [2007-05-23 13:03]:
>> > (Sorry for not doing the homework myself, but the question keeps
>> > popping into the back of my head for follow up, but I haven't had
>> > time).
>>
>>   I am assuming you mean integrating syslog-ng into a consolidation,
>>   rather than just the smf(5) service conversions, like those given in
>> 
>> http://www.technicalarticles.org/index.php/Setting_Up_a_Syslog-NG_Host_on_Solaris_10
>>
>>   and
>> 
>> http://wadofstuff.blogspot.com/2007/03/smf-manifests-for-isc-dhcpd-splunk-and.html
>>
>>   I believe the most recent discussion on syslog enhancement was held on
>>   networking-discuss last year
>> 
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/networking-discuss/2006-June/007612.html
>>
>>   but there may have been others.  A syslog update is not required by
>>   any of the smf(5) plans I know of, although smf(5)'s own use of
>>   logging needs some consistency/completeness work...
>>
>>   - Stephen
>> 
>> --
>> sch at sun.com  http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> sfwnv-discuss mailing list
> sfwnv-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sfwnv-discuss
>

Reply via email to