Norm, Do we need to keep it clean (ie. no WARNINGS)
Is tar a valid source archive type? ;) Cheers, Jim Ivan shi wrote: > Hi, > > I did a meta check in my package. > > $ make -f Makefile.sfw meta-check > METADATA: WARNING: unknown license type 'iozone copyright' > METADATA: WARNING: SOURCE_DOWNLOAD entry (iozone3_321.tar) doesn't refer > to a source archive > > I have the items in METADATA file: > > LICENSE: iozone copyright, GPLv2 > SOURCE_DOWNLOAD: http://www.iozone.org/src/current/iozone3_321.tar > > 1)The pkg has an author's copyright, which doesn't match the list in > metainfo.pl. > 2)The tarball can be downloaded from that url. > > So do I need to care the two warnings? > > Thanks, > Ivan
