One more comment about #3 as in #4d, do you really need the patch loop. 
  I see only one patch.

Steve C.


Muktha Narayan wrote:
> Hi Suresh,
> Below are a few comments after a quick look at your webrev:
> 
> 1. usr/src/pkgdefs/Makefile
>    Please add the entry in alphabatical order.
> 
> 2. METADATA
>     Please check if the license needs to be mentioned as GPL v2
> 
> 3. Makefile.sfw   
>     Hard-coding of version can be avoided and this info can be picked up 
> from METADATA, something like:
>     VER = $(COMPONENT_NAME:sh)-$(COMPONENT_VERSION:sh)
> 
> 4. install-convmv
>     a) Usually the install scripts are named as install-sfw.
>     b) It is recommended to use /usr/bin/ksh3 instead of /bin/sh.
>         This allows you to add:
>         # stop at first error
>           set -o errexit
>          And to call "source" instead of "." in this line:
>          source ${SRC}/tools/install.subr
>     c) Please change the copyright year to 2009.
>     d) Since there is only one binary and one man page that is being 
> installed. In my opinion, the 'for' loops are not required  
>     e) The binary should be installed as executable 'E' and not as 
> normal files as below:
>         _install E ${i} ${BINDIR}/${i} 555
>         'N' is generally used for normal files.
> 
> 5. SUNWconvmv/Makefile
>     Since you are not using the default depend file, please remove the 
> empty DATAFILES entry.
> 
> 6. prototype_com
>     Entries for usr/share and usr/share/man dirs also need to be added.
> 
> Regards
> Muktha
> 
> Suresh Chandrasekharan wrote:
>> Changes at
>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~suresh/convmv_webrev/
>>
>> Suresh Chandrasekharan wrote:
>>   
>>> Hi All,
>>>    Pl. review the changes to integrate convmv 1.14
>>> Regards,
>>> Suresh
>>>
>>>     
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sfwnv-discuss mailing list
>> sfwnv-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sfwnv-discuss
>>   
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sfwnv-discuss mailing list
> sfwnv-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sfwnv-discuss

Reply via email to