>From Denis.Migounov at sun.com Wed Feb 18 08:23:47 2009
>Mike Sullivan wrote:
>> first, I actually delete almost all 'code review request' mails to this
>> alias so asking me questions inside them is not a real reliable way
>> to get an answer :)
>I wrote to your primary address as well, but the message returned as
>undelivered for some reason.
Sendmail on my desktop had halfway died early sunday morning. Software
seems to know holidays and stormy weekends are good for that, and its
even better when they overlap :)
>> but the answer is "I don't know". If it retains the keywords yes.
>> If it doesn't, then no - and it may not if it still thinks its
>> name is install-cvs. wx nits or keywords would complain if it doesn't
>> but perhaps if you go 'sccs get' it again it will show the new name.
>> Though personally I'd not bother renaming it in the first place.
>That's what I'm thinking too, but Paul says "install-sfw" is better :-)
Well, long ago when people started introducing install-<thingy> instead
of install-sfw I argued I liked install-sfw better for consistency too,
but I like arguing even less about something that doesn't matter that
much so I didn't fight hard (after all, I like it so I can do
'grep blah */cmd/install-sfw' but I can do 'grep blah */cmd/install*'
and filter out extras too :).
I wouldn't object to you doing the rename, but if someone is really
trying to enforce consistency it would be better to go fix them all
in one wad. At least to me.
I like changes that fix bugs rather than changes that are just changes
or mostly cosmetic. And no, lets all not start arguing about that, I
already have to go to the dentist today I don't need to come back to
1000 "You're a looney" messages, I can send those to myself :)
Mike
