On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 01:15:37PM -0600, Norm Jacobs wrote: > Nicolas Williams wrote: > >On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:41:20AM -0800, Mike.Sullivan at sun.com wrote: > > > >>>From Nicolas.Williams at sun.com Wed Feb 27 10:10:19 200 > >>Then again, if you're putting it into the proto area anyway then moving & > >>deleting I don't know why you just do the install into the right spots in > >>the first place, then delete the bits you don't want? Though perhaps > >>there's a lot more to delete individually then. > >> > > > >Because that means knowing what those bits are. What if the next > >version of SQLite3 installs lemon (a parser generator)? > > > >I'd much rather have full control over what gets installed. > > > Yes, it does mean knowing what those bits are. If it delivers a new > file or stops delivering a file, you will find out the first time you > run nightly(1). The proto area and packages won't match. If you cherry
Not so. nightly in SFW does no unref file checks, I think (I haven't run nightly(1) yet, but I don't see any files in the nametable that would allow one to list unreferenced files).
