Shawn Walker wrote: > Like that matters; the LSB is completely irrelevant to most GNU/Linux > customers. > > It doesn't guarantee squat really. The only one that seems to care > about it are vendors that run around crowing about their LSB support. > By my experience there seems to be another group interested. These are the vocal (mostly non-productive) types who love to point out that something follows the FSH guidelines or not. Its really a pain. Particularly when something had a well defined location, before anything called the LSB or FSH existed.
Sigh,... I feel better now! (Not only did I get to grouse, but also to be off-topic!) - jek3
