Stefan -

Tonight I did a build of bash 4.0 in snv_121 (x86) using your new files. 
   I got a clean build of the package, did a pkgrm on the old SUNWbash, 
and then a pkgadd on SUNWbashr and SUNWbash.   This all went well.

When doing the pkgrm on SUNWbash initially, there are lots of other 
packages that depend on SUNWbash (see below).   Are all of these tested 
somehow to make sure they work work with 4.0?  Maybe that is not needed.

I was amazed at all the patches that were needed and impressed that you 
did all that work.   I have not checked all the patches, but would be 
happy to perform any tests.

Steve C.


WARNING:
     The <SUNWfirefox> package depends on the package
     currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWgnome-libs> package depends on the package
     currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWgnome-xml-share> package depends on the
     package currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWgnome-themes> package depends on the package
     currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWautogen> package depends on the package
     currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWa2psu> package depends on the package
     currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWapr13dev> package depends on the package
     currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWphp52u> package depends on the package
     currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWjruby> package depends on the package
     currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWareca> package depends on the package
     currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWgnome-desktop-prefs> package depends on the
     package currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWavant> package depends on the package
     currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWlibconfuse> package depends on the package
     currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWlibtool> package depends on the package
     currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWxdg-user-dirs> package depends on the package
     currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWnet-snmp-utils> package depends on the package
     currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWnmap> package depends on the package currently
     being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWpampkcs11r> package depends on the package
     currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWopenproj> package depends on the package
     currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWpatchutils> package depends on the package
     currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWphp52r-pear> package depends on the package
     currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWquiltu> package depends on the package
     currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWdialog> package depends on the package
     currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWfoomatic-db-engineu> package depends on the
     package currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWgit> package depends on the package currently
     being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWgnome-a11y-reader> package depends on the
     package currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWgnome-config-java> package depends on the
     package currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWgnome-im-client> package depends on the
     package currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWgnome-terminal-java> package depends on the
     package currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWxdg-utils> package depends on the package
     currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWpconsole> package depends on the package
     currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWgnome-base-libs-java-devel> package depends on
     the package currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWslib> package depends on the package currently
     being removed.





Stefan Teleman wrote:
> No bash fans on this list ? :-) Anyone ? :-)
> 
> --Stefan
> 
> -----
> 
> Stefan Teleman wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Here's the webrev for bash 4.0 for review:
>>
>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~steleman/6872264/
>>
>> If someone would take the time and code review I would greatly 
>> appreciate it.
>>
>> Thank you very much.
> 
> 

Reply via email to