Thanks, I saw the bug report as well.

I'll have a look at the issue and will let you know what I find.

Cheers

Amanda

 Norm Jacobs wrote:
> I have filed
>    6883134 ruby build fails with proto path length of 40
> to track this and have come up with a fix that someone more familiar 
> with ruby should look at.  My webrev is at
>    http://cr.opensolaris.org/~jacobs/webrev-6883134/
>
> It appears that if strlen($ROOT) == 40 run into the problem, so 
> workspace pathname length of 22 on sparc and 23 on x86 seems to do it 
> for me.  I took a look at mkconfig.rb and while it's largely greek to 
> me, It appears to use perl like regular expressions.  The following 
> patch seems to fix it for me, but someone with ruby experience ought 
> to review this.
>
> --- ruby-1.8.7-p72/mkconfig.rb.orig   Thu Sep 17 07:31:55 2009
> +++ ruby-1.8.7-p72/mkconfig.rb  Thu Sep 17 07:32:13 2009
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
>       continued_name = name
>       next
>     end
> -  when /^"(.+)"\s*(\\)?$/
> +  when /^"(.*)"\s*(\\)?$/
>     if continued_line
>       continued_line <<  $1
>       unless $2
>
>    -Norm
>
>
> Amanda waite wrote:
>> Norm Jacobs wrote:
>>>
>>> I finally go a chance to finish tracking this down.  It appears that 
>>> if the path to your proto area is sized just so, the ruby build will 
>>> generate a config.status that has
>>>   S["CFLAGS"]="....."\
>>>   ""
>>> in it.  later in the ruby build, ruby appears to generate 
>>> rbconfig.rb using a combination of their tools and config.status.  
>>> The continued line "" in config.status appears to confuse their 
>>> parser causing an invalid rbconfig.rb to be generated.  Since they 
>>> use rbconfig.rb for the rest of their build, it goes horribly 
>>> wrong.  I'm not a ruby god, so it will probably take me a little bit 
>>> to generate a fix.  In the meantime, you can workaround this (if you 
>>> run into it) by making your workspace pathname shorter or longer.
>> Do you know what length of path actually causes the issue? If I can 
>> recreate it I might be able to get a handle on the issue.
>>
>> Thanks for looking into this, it seems unlikely that I would have 
>> been able to recreate this unless I got really (un)lucky.
>>
>> Amanda
>>
>>>
>>> For any ruby gods that want to lend me a clue, the command that 
>>> generates rbconfig.rb is
>>>
>>> $ ./miniruby -I./lib -I.ext/common -I./- -r./ext/purelib.rb  
>>> ./ext/extmk.rb --make="/usr/ccs/bin/make" --dest-dir=""  
>>> --extout=".ext"  --mflags=""  --make-flags="" --extension  
>>> --extstatic  --
>>>
>>>    -Norm
>>>
>>>
>>> Norm Jacobs wrote:
>>>> Amanda Waite wrote:
>>>>> I've just built Ruby from an SFW workspace on build 122 on x64 and 
>>>>> it all went ok. I'll run nightly tomorrow. I don't expect a  
>>>>> negative result so hopefully Norm has some idea.
>>>>>
>>>>> Amanda
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike Sullivan wrote:
>>>>>> Amanda Waite wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Milan,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm just getting my x64 build system updated and will run some 
>>>>>>> tests on a clean workspace tomorrow. The problem maybe to do 
>>>>>>> with the way the build has written it's rbconfig.rb file so the 
>>>>>>> answer maybe further up in the output from the build.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've only seen this once, in one of norm's builds, and he claimed to
>>>>>> have seen it and have a fix somewhere. So it's probably time to hope
>>>>>> he responds :)
>>>> I ran across this last week while working on some changes to 
>>>> standardize the individual component build some.  I have narrowed 
>>>> it down some, but still haven't had a chance to find the ultimate 
>>>> cuplrit.  In my case, It works for me when I set ROOT to a proto 
>>>> area for a workspace without all of my changes.  I have some 
>>>> problems with my proto area that I am working out.  My workspace 
>>>> has changes to about 200 of the Makefiles that build SFW bits prior 
>>>> to ruby, so the net's pretty big right now.  Can you send me a 
>>>> pointer to your system and the workspace that you are having the 
>>>> problems with.  It may help me isolate the problem quicker.
>>>>    -Norm
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Mike
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Milan Jurik wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /export/home/luser/sfwnv/usr/src/cmd/ruby18/ruby-1.8.7-p72/lib/mkmf.rb:1676:in
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> `dup': can't dup NilClass (TypeError)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> from 
>>>>>>>> /export/home/luser/sfwnv/usr/src/cmd/ruby18/ruby-1.8.7-p72/lib/mkmf.rb:1676:in
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> `init_mkmf'
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> from 
>>>>>>>> /export/home/luser/sfwnv/usr/src/cmd/ruby18/ruby-1.8.7-p72/lib/mkmf.rb:1736
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> sfwnv-discuss mailing list
>>>>> sfwnv-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sfwnv-discuss
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to