Stefan, On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Stefan Teleman <stefan.teleman at sun.com> wrote: > Lukas Oboril wrote: >> >> mainly looks and works good to me, but one minor question ... why >> these lib are not build with stdcxx ? These are build with libCstd. We >> have Apache C++ Standard Library included in. Why libCstd ? If I >> remember good, some PSARC exists and saying all C++ things have to be >> build with stdcxx. > > Yes, that's what PSARC/2008/549 (stdcxx) said. > > But we don't (yet) have a completed plan to switch all of OpenSolaris from > libCstd.so.1 to libstdcxx4.so.4 -- there are too many parts involved in > doing this, and OpenSolaris 2010.02 is just too close around the corner. > > So, we're still tied to libCstd.so.1 for now. :-( >
ok When I did quick race through your changes, I discovered a small workaround to set up right runtime path. There is question if anyone working on libtool fix and upgrade. > --Stefan > > -- > Stefan Teleman > Sun Microsystems, Inc. > stefan.teleman at Sun.COM > > Luc -- Lukas 'Luc' Oboril IRC nickname: luc^ at freenode When dealing with people, let us remember we are not dealing with creatures of logic. We are dealing with creatures of emotions, creatures bristling with prejudices and motivated by pride and vanity. Dale Carnegie
