Marcel Telka wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 12:33:19PM +0000, Paul Cunningham wrote:
>> This looks okay to me too. But I must point out that the files delivered  
> 
> Thanks, Paul.
> 
>> into /usr (see prototype_com) have the 'write' permission bit set  
>> (including the new file for this version).
> 
> This is really important. I looked around to see whether the mutt is alone, 
> but
> I found following on my Nevada build 126:
> 
> $ ls -la /usr/bin/|grep ^-.-|wc -l
> 1242
> $ ls -la /usr/bin/|grep ^-.w|wc -l
> 663
> $
> 
> So it seems it is about 2:1 (read only vs. read/write) :-).
> 
> I compared with some Linux distribution and I found that there is less than 5 
> %
> files with read only. Everything else is rw.
> 
> 
> Is there any recommendation/standard for Solaris?

I think that might be that all *new* files going into /usr from sfw 
should not have it set - but check with Norm Jacobs 
<Norm.Jacobs at sun.com>; but in some cases they are being changed as the 
pkg is updated to a newer version.

Paul

Reply via email to