On Thu, Jan 9, 2020, 9:15 AM Billy O'Neal (VC LIBS) via Lib < [email protected]> wrote:
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p1902r1.html says > “no macro necessary”. Should I take such attributions in that paper as “SG6 > looked at it and is OK with no macro”? > > > > Billy3 > +SG10 (is it too late to rename our document to SD10 for consistency?) The paper just adds support for incomplete types to reference_wrapper. What code would you write based on the presence of that feature? The paper seems to suggest bumping __cpp_lib_reference_wrapper, but we didnt have that one before, and I'm not sure it makes sense to introduce for this case? Barry >
-- SG10 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10
