On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:45 AM Thomas Köppe via Core <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Core! > > I was contacted regarding P0614R1 > <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2017/p0614r1.html>, > which adds an optional initializer to the range-based "for" loop. The > proposal did not add any feature test macros. The person suggested > updating __cpp_range_based_for to a more recent value (suggested "2017L"). > > Do you think we should do that? Is it even editorial? > > Thank you! > > Thomas > CCing SG10. See Richard's response here: https://lists.isocpp.org/sg10/2020/03/0708.php. Barry
-- SG10 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10
