On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 23:30, Gabriel Dos Reis via SG10 <[email protected]> wrote: > > At the time, I think I would have thought one was not needed, but that could > be wrong. > > > > Indeed, this sounds to be like an overkill application of feature test > macros, but…
Well, this macro gives users with the use case I depicted some more choices: 1) use a work-around that is just.. ..ghastly 2) provide an ADL-only customization point if and only if it can be written without ghastliness 3) just provide a customization point that is not ADL-only 4) do (1) or (3) if (2) is not available -- SG10 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10
