On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 18:15, Barry Revzin <[email protected]> wrote: >> I find it rather plausible that a simplicity-seeking programmer will >> just not provide a structured-bindings >> interface that he also wants to allow calling via ADL outside >> structured bindings when an implementation >> of P0846 is not available. > I'm having trouble parsing this sentence. Is the claim that being unable to > write get<0>(e) is a reason for somebody to avoid opting into structured > bindings?
The claim is that it's plausible to not provide a get<> if it can't be ADL-called without additional incantations. Choosing to do so will also not-enable support for structured bindings. -- SG10 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10
