Resending from the right email account....
> We looked at > https://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21summer2020/LibraryWorkingGroup/d0943r6.html > in the LWG telecon today. It proposes to add a __cpp_lib_atomic_compat > macro. > > It was pointed out that "compat" is a bit generic and could mean different > things in different contexts. Should we instead name the macro after the > header? I think that's our policy when there's no reason to do otherwise. > It's complicated here by the header being <stdatomic.h> and we can't have a > dot in a macro name. > > Should it be __cpp_lib_stdatomic_h then? >
-- SG10 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10
