On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 23:42, Casey Carter <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 3:27 PM Jonathan Wakely via SG10 < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I think the following papers should have had a feature test macro: >> >> P0848 >> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p0848r3.html> >> Conditionally Trivial Special Member Functions >> >> P1330 >> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1330r0.pdf> >> Changing the active member of a union inside constexpr >> >> I need a union in order to implement the std::variant changes in P2231 >> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2231r1.html> >> and a conditionally trivial destructor makes it easier. In order to define >> the __cpp_lib_constexpr_variant macro correctly I need to know if the union >> usage is actually going to work, but there's no macro for P1330, so I can't >> tell. >> >> A macro for constexpr destructors (P0784R7 >> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p0784r7.html>?) >> might have been nice too, because if the compiler doesn't support it then >> you get an error for even trying to declare a destructor constexpr. Without >> a feature test macro there's no reliable way to try to use the feature. >> > > This proposal added __cpp_constexpr_dynamic_alloc. > Oops, yes, thanks! > >> If all the compilers I need to support already implemented those >> features, I wouldn't care, but they don't. >> >> https://godbolt.org/z/qG6d7TxhE >> >> >> -- >> SG10 mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10 >> >
-- SG10 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10
