For context, we recently added more functionality to std::string and we added:
- __cpp_lib_string_contains for P1679R3 - __cpp_lib_string_resize_and_overwrite for P1072R10 Those were nearly two years apart, so it's not like we never do this for adding members. I don't know what the policy should be though: in this case there's no __cpp_lib_string that we could have bumped, and I suppose it would've been weird to introduce it for.. contains()? Barry On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 12:05 PM Jonathan Wakely via SG10 < [email protected]> wrote: > Please see below. LWG is doing a prioritisation poll on this library > issue. If you have an opinion here, please participate in the thread, > especially if you feel that the proposed resolution is wrong (otherwise we > might fast-track it to Tentatively Ready). > > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Tim Song via Lib <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021, 13:46 > Subject: Re: [isocpp-lib] Issue 3621: Remove feature-test macro > __cpp_lib_monadic_optional > To: Library Working Group <[email protected]> > Cc: Tim Song <[email protected]> > > > Should we ask SG10 to weigh in? I'm not sure we have any guidelines on > bumping vs new macro. > > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 8:32 AM Jonathan Wakely via Lib > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > It's Monday, so it must be bug prioritization time! > > Thanks to everyone who participates. > > > > https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3621 > > > > Priority levels: > > P0 - Has a proposed resolution and that resolution is clearly correct. > Requires unanimity among the people doing prioritization. Move the issue to > "Tentatively Ready" or "Ready" (whichever is appropriate for the group > doing the review); we don't want to spend any more time discussing this > issue. [Shortened: Approve, and move on.] > > P1 - Showstopper bug; don't ship a standard w/o resolving this. > > P2 - Important bug. > > P3 - Normal bug. > > P4 - Less important bug. > > > > The most common priority should be P3. > > > > Please add your comments to this thread. > > _______________________________________________ > > Lib mailing list > > [email protected] > > Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/lib > > Searchable archives: http://lists.isocpp.org/lib/2021/11/index.php > _______________________________________________ > Lib mailing list > [email protected] > Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/lib > Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/lib/2021/11/20889.php > -- > SG10 mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10 >
-- SG10 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10
