On Wednesday, 16 November 2022 22:54:51 CET Barry Revzin via Core wrote: > We have > https://isocpp.org/std/standing-documents/sd-6-sg10-feature-test-recommenda > tions#__cpp_range_based_for already so we might as well bump it. > > I'm not sure what you would actually do with the information tho - there's > not really any benefit to writing the loop two ways, just write it the way > that works.
#if __cpp_range_based_for <= 201603 #error "Your compiler is not supported." #endif I believe it's a valid approach to require the simpler lifetime rules and stop thinking about temporaries when using range-based for. -- ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Dr. Matthias Kretz https://mattkretz.github.io GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research https://gsi.de stdₓ::simd ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -- SG10 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10
