Dear Sir,
Thank you for the reply.
I am having total of 7 cores currently. I have created a sample job as shown
below:-#!/bin/bash#$ -S /bin/bash#$ -l h_rt=01:00:00#$ -R y#$ -j y#$ -e
/home/chem/test/$JOB_ID.error#$ -o /home/chem/test/$JOB_ID.out#$ -pe orte 4#
print date and timedatempirun -np $NSLOTS hostname
So i have created 2 sample files with 4 core each and 3 core each and the jobs
are submitted asqsub sample4.sh; qsub sample4.sh; qsub sample2.sh
But as per my requirement first 4 core job has to be run and the next 4 core
job has to wait till the first 4 core job gets executed as per FIFO but her
first 4 core and the 3 core job are running. Kindly help me to get FIFO based
architecture.
My qconf ssconf output is [locuz@ge ~]$ qconf -ssconfalgorithm
defaultschedule_interval 0:0:5maxujobs
0queue_sort_method loadjob_load_adjustments
np_load_avg=0.50load_adjustment_decay_time 0:7:30load_formula
np_load_avgschedd_job_info trueflush_submit_sec
0flush_finish_sec 0params
nonereprioritize_interval 0:0:0halftime
168usage_weight_list
cpu=1.000000,mem=0.000000,io=0.000000compensation_factor
5.000000weight_user 0.250000weight_project
0.250000weight_department 0.250000weight_job
0.250000weight_tickets_functional 1weight_tickets_share
1share_override_tickets TRUEshare_functional_shares
TRUEmax_functional_jobs_to_schedule 200report_pjob_tickets
TRUEmax_pending_tasks_per_job 50halflife_decay_list
nonepolicy_hierarchy NONEweight_ticket
0.010000weight_waiting_time 0.000000weight_deadline
3600000.000000weight_urgency 0.100000weight_priority
1.000000max_reservation 20default_duration
8760:00:00
Also i have changed h_rt value ash_rt 2:00:00
queuename qtype resv/used/tot. load_avg arch
states---------------------------------------------------------------------------------al...@c1.test.server
BIP 0/4/4 0.00 linux-x64 192 0.60500 sample4.sh
chem r 04/04/2016 22:33:50 1 194 0.50500 sample2.sh chem
r 04/04/2016 22:33:50
3---------------------------------------------------------------------------------al...@ge.test.server
BIP 0/3/3 0.02 linux-x64 192 0.60500 sample4.sh
chem r 04/04/2016 22:33:50 3
############################################################################ -
PENDING JOBS - PENDING JOBS - PENDING JOBS - PENDING JOBS - PENDING
JOBS############################################################################
193 0.60500 sample4.sh chem qw 04/04/2016 22:33:47 4
Username:- chem; queue:- all.q; nodes:- ge.test.server(3 core),c1.test.server(4
core)Kindly help me to resolve the issue.
Thanks & Regards,A.Narsimha Reddy.
> Subject: Re: [SGE-discuss] Resource Reservation
> From: [email protected]
> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 17:25:09 +0200
> CC: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
>
>
> > Am 02.04.2016 um 19:01 schrieb Narsimha Reddy <[email protected]>:
> >
> > Dear Team,
> >
> > Kindly help me out for the implementation of resource reservation in the
> > Grid Engine.
> >
> > I want this for the implementation of pure FIFO model to be applied for
> > grid engine jobs as per the job ids.
>
> Mostly you need these settings in the scheduler configuration:
>
> $ qconf -ssconf
> ...
> policy_hierarchy NONE
> ...
> max_reservation 20
> default_duration 8760:00:00
>
> and jobs should be submitted with `qsub -R y ...` (could be defined as
> default in "sge_request"). It's advisable to replace the default runtime with
> the real expected one. Despite the FIFO scheduling, backfilling could still
> occur as this would use resources which would idle otherwise and won't
> influence the FIFO of other jobs.
>
> -- Reuti
_______________________________________________
SGE-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://arc.liv.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/sge-discuss
